Function selector with external hard wired button array on computer chassis that generates interrupt to system processor

ABSTRACT

The invention is a computer system with a button array on the computer chassis for simulating the operation of common consumer electronic devices. Each button of the array of buttons is hardwired to the system processor. Upon activation of one of these buttons, an interrupt signal is sent to the system processor. The system processor halts whatever it is doing, and subsequently identifies the activated button. A signal generator attached to the buttons then sends the system processor a second interrupt signal, such that upon exiting the handling of the first interrupt, the system processor is presented with a second interrupt. The system processor then handles the second interrupt. While handling this second interrupt, the system processor executes whatever function corresponds to the activated button. The system processor then exits the handling of the second interrupt and resumes whatever activity it was engaged in before the activation of the button.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present invention relates generally to subject matter disclosed in commonly assigned United States patent application, U.S. Ser. No. 08/846,641, filed concurrently herewith, entitled "COMPUTER SYSTEM CAPABLE OF PLAYING AUDIO CD'S IN A CD-ROM DRIVE INDEPENDENT OF AN OPERATING SYSTEM," the teachings of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to personal computer interfaces. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved user interface for a personal computer that simulates the input/output interface used in other consumer electronics, such as compact disk (CD) players.

Computers have undergone a dramatic evolution since their introduction in the late 1970's and early 1980's. Early computer systems were difficult to use and understand. Typically, data was input to the computer by typing specific memorized commands into a keyboard. A one-task operating system such as MS-DOS (Microsoft Disk Operating System) was loaded on the computer and functioned to interpret and execute the commands.

Many improvements have been developed for computer systems since the introduction of the first systems. One of the areas that has improved is the user interface. For example, modem system keyboards have greater input capabilities than the keyboards used with the first computer systems. The early keyboards typically had 83 keys. To give the user additional options, keyboards with added keys (such as the CONTROL and FUNCTION keys) were introduced. However, the addition of keys to the original keyboard design had certain drawbacks. For example, a greater number of keys led to additional complexity and hence, confusion for the user. This confusion was compounded by a lack of continuity among applications for special keys or combinations of keys. For example, a key or a combination of keys that has one function with one application very likely has a different function when another application is running. Thus, although the addition of keys to the keyboard resulted in a more powerful keyboard, the trade-off was that the keyboard was more difficult to use.

For many computer users, memorizing and typing in commands to the computer via the keyboard is awkward and complicated. Because of this, alternate data input devices to the keyboard have been developed. One of the most popular of these alternate data input devices is a mouse. To maximize the usefulness of the mouse and to simplify entry of commands into a computer, software vendors have developed graphical user interfaces (GUI's) that implement graphics, special menu technology, and the mouse. One of these graphical user interfaces has been referred to as WIMP (which stands for Windows, Icons, Mouse, and Pull-down) menus. The WIMP concept implements several windows on the screen, icons, mouse operation, and pull-down menus containing functions. By using a mouse, the user can move a pointer, a cross-hair, or an arrow across the screen. When the user presses the mouse button, she can select items from a menu, mark text in a word processing program, or paint in a drawing program. However, as computer systems, operating systems, and software applications become increasingly powerful, many more icons or pull-down options are available for selection by the user. Operating systems and software applications may require a user to navigate many "levels" of icons or pull-down windows before reaching the desired application or command. Under these circumstances, rather than simplifying the entry of commands to the computer, the graphical user interface may actually add complexity and confusion. Instead of wasting time progressing through many levels of icons or pull-up windows, many users prefer once again to memorize commands and use the admittedly complicated and awkward keyboard to select applications and commands. Thus, there is a need for some input method or device that increases "user friendliness" by reducing operator confusion when performing or executing certain system functions.

The keyboard and the mouse share other common problems. For instance, computers often pause or "hang" for differing periods of time while being used by an operator (e.g. during auto-save, while printing, or while running another application). For some operating systems, such as the Microsoft Windows 95 operating system, an hourglass icon is shown on the computer screen during this period when the user is awaiting a system response. Unfortunately, neither the keyboard or the mouse are capable of interrupting the system processor during these periods, and the computer, therefore, is unresponsive to any user command except a reboot. A user thus experiences a loss of control that can be disconcerting during these wait periods. Therefore, a need also exists for some method or interface device to permit a user to enter certain commands to a computer to obtain an immediate response. The availability of an immediate response increases the "user friendliness" of the system by improving the responsiveness of the computer.

The computer industry is continually striving to provide additional computer enhancements to entice computer novices to purchase a computer system. Despite the near universal presence of the computer in the office environment, many people still are uncomfortable with computers and are unwilling to purchase or upgrade a home computer. Therefore, it is important for computer designers to add new features to each computer while at the same time giving the user a feeling of familiarity and comfort. Thus, the computer designer must add features (and complexity) while actually making the computer easier to use. In addition, new computer systems preferably are compatible with current computer systems. As such, any invention that enhances user friendliness by reducing operator confusion and by improving the responsiveness of the computer must also operate seamlessly with a broad range of already existing applications and systems. That is, the invention should be compatible with other computers and applications that are on the market such that an application that can operate on another computer can still operate without difficulty on a newly designed computer system.

As a further complication, all of these design criteria must be done in the framework of maintaining the affordability of the computer system. Thus, any new feature preferably can be implemented using existing hardware or inexpensive components. Thus, ideally, many more functions would be provided to the user without any additional cost, while increasing user friendliness.

One possible way to provide more capabilities is to add additional keys to the keyboard, but the addition of more keys to the keyboard would be impractical and would not solve many of the problems existing in prior art data input devices. First, more keys on the keyboard would complicate and change the layout of the keyboard, thereby leading to greater confusion by the user. This confusion would be exacerbated if the function associated with an additional key changed from application to application as is typical. Second, fitting additional keys on a keyboard would require a larger keyboard or smaller keys. Since keyboards are, to a great extent, standardized within the industry, adding keys to the keyboard is undesirable and might cause compatibility problems with keyboards presently on the market. Changes to the structure of the mouse similarly would be undesirable. Further, a more complicated keyboard or mouse would still suffer many of the same drawbacks as the simpler keyboards and mice. For example, an operator still would not be able to interrupt the system when it is busy, even where the user would prefer for the computer do something else.

Thus, a superior method or device is needed for the input of commands into the computer. Future computer processors will become increasingly more powerful, making the computer capable of performing even more functions than it does today. For example, a modem computer may double as a telephone answering machine (TAM). Such a computer may also double as a television or an audio CD player. Other roles for the computer will inevitably develop. However, these capabilities are undermined because the average user may be unable or unwilling to access these features. For instance, to use the computer system as a TAM, an operator is required to proceed with the mouse through multiple levels of icons before an audio message can be played. As the array of options increases, users will be faced with increasingly complex graphics user interfaces unless another solution is found.

The ideal solution would be to offset the increased computer capabilities with a "user friendly" interface to facilitate ease of use as much as possible. Furthermore, it would be desirable if an interface was developed that was equally effective, regardless of the operating system or application being run. It would further be desirable if the interface caused the computer to respond quickly to user commands. It would also be desirable if the user interface used components already present in computer systems to minimize the cost to implement the user interface.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention solves the deficiencies of the prior art by including a small array of buttons that can be used to control certain computer system functions. The buttons can be conveniently located on the top of a mini-tower computer design to answer telephone calls, control the playback of CD's, and provide other desired capabilities by depression of a single button. Alternately, the buttons may reside on the monitor. In any case, these buttons preferably are hardwired to the computer system's microprocessor.

The present invention's small array of buttons preferably are capable of initiating a high level interrupt signal to the system processor so that the user can select certain system functions, regardless of whether the processor is executing other applications. This results in the system processor executing an interrupt handling routine, in which the processor identifies the activated button. Upon exiting this interrupt handling routine, the processor is presented with a second high-level interrupt. This second high-level interrupt is preferably of a different magnitude than the first. Nonetheless, the second high level interrupt initiates a second interrupt handling routine. While handling the second interrupt, the processor executes a function that corresponds to the activated button. The processor then exits the second interrupt routine and resumes executing whatever activity it was engaged in before the depression of the button.

Thus, the present invention comprises a combination of features and advantages which enable it to overcome various problems of prior devices. The various characteristics described above, as well as other features, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is an illustration of an array of bezel buttons for providing a high priority user input to the computer system in accordance with the preferred embodiment.

FIG. 2 shows a schematic circuit illustration of the preferred circuit implementation.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the preferred sequence executed by the microprocessor of the present invention upon receipt of a system management interrupt signal.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the preferred sequence executed by the microprocessor of the present invention upon receipt of a non-maskable interrupt signal.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring now to FIG. 1, the computer system constructed in accordance with the preferred embodiment includes an array of bezel buttons 110 located on the housing or chassis 100 of a computer. As shown in FIG. 1, the computer chassis 100 may be configured as a mini-tower design with buttons 110 located on the upper surface. Each button in the array preferably corresponds to a single function of the computer. In the preferred embodiment, the buttons are selected to correspond to functions that a user is familiar with from other household electronic appliances such as telephone answering machines (TAM) or an audio CD player. For example, button 120 is labeled with the familiar symbol for PLAY, corresponding to a PLAY button on a TAM. The preferred embodiment also includes buttons corresponding to STOP and other functions often present on consumer electronics. To distinguish PLAY on a CD player from PLAY on a telephone answering machine, an additional symbol may be added to the surface of the button. For example, a small telephone icon may be added to indicate a telephone answering machine function.

Thus, these buttons provide the user a mechanism to use the computer as another electronic appliance without the need to progress through the tedious routine normally demanded to initiate a computer program. This concept is described in a commonly assigned United States patent application, U.S. Ser. No. 08/846,641, filed concurrently herewith, entitled "COMPUTER SYSTEM CAPABLE OF PLAYING AUDIO CD'S IN A CD-ROM DRIVE INDEPENDENT OF AN OPERATING SYSTEM," the teachings of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Furthermore, these buttons present the user with an interface that is familiar. Preferably, each button 110 continuously corresponds to the same function, regardless of what operating system or application is running.

Referring now to FIG. 2, an exemplary schematic circuit diagram is shown for constructing an array of bezel buttons. As shown in FIG. 2, the computer system includes a CPU or microprocessor 280, a CPU interface controller 281 with associated RAM (Random Access Memory) 292, an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) 250, and a CD player 290. ASIC 250 is a specially designed chip made by SMC (Standard Microsystems Corp). Address and data bus 285 preferably transmits signals between the microprocessor 280 and RAM 292 via the interface controller 281. Also shown is an array of touch-sensitive switches, generally depicted as array 210. One aspect of the invention is the utilization of the minimum total number of input and output lines. Thus, for twelve buttons the ideal electrical arrangement is a 3-by-4 array. A 6-by-2 array, requiring a total of eight input and output lines, therefore is not preferred. Three of the twelve illustrated switches are labeled 212, 214, and 216 for purposes of discussion. Each of the switches 210 connects to one of input lines 230, 231, or 232. Pull-up resistors 220 and positive voltage source 225 also are individually coupled to input lines 230, 231, 232. In addition, each of switches 210 connects to one of output lines 240, 241, 242, 243. Input lines 230-232 and output lines 240-243 all connect to ASIC 250.

The ASIC 250 preferably includes tri-state gates 201-207, with one of the tri-state gates each connected to input and output lines 230-232, 240-243. As is well known in the art, tri-state gates are capable of three different logic states: a logic 0, a logic 1, or a high impedance. Thus, each line, 240-243 may be latched to a high or low state, or may float free.

The ASIC 250 also preferably includes register 254. Register 254 reflects the logic states of tri-state gates 201-207. Since each tri-state gate has 3 logic states, each logic gate 201-207 requires 2 bits to reflect its current logic state. Therefore, register 254 should be twice as many bits wide as there are tri-state gates in the ASIC 250. For the illustrated seven tri-state gates 201-207, register 254 should be at least 14 bits wide. Register 254 preferably is read/write such that ASIC 250 can change the state of any tri-state gate by writing over the appropriate bits. ASIC 250 also can determine the state of any tri-state gate 201-207 by reading the respective bits of register 254.

ASIC 250 also includes one or more registers 255. Register 255 is at least as wide as the number of input lines 230-232 plus the number of output lines 240-243. Thus, for twelve switches and the corresponding seven lines, register 255 is at least seven bits wide. This allows a one-to-one correspondence between the bits in the register 255 and the states of the input and output lines 230-232, 240-243 such that one bit in the register 255 reflects the line state (low or high voltage) of the respective input or output line. Register 255 can be read at any time to determine the line voltage state of any of the input or output lines (with the understanding that the bits of register 255 are not strictly latched to the lines 230-232, 240-243, as explained below). Also as explained below, ASIC 250 includes a register 256 with a bit storing the status of an NMI₋₋ INT flag. The NMI₋₋ INT flag indicates whether the ASIC 250 should generate an interrupt signal to be delivered to the microprocessor 280. Further, ASIC 250 includes a look-up table 258 for correlating a particular button 210 with a particular function. Look-up table 258 preferably is implemented with a conventional read-only memory (ROM) device. In addition, ASIC 250 connects electrically to output lines 260 and 261. Line 260 carries an external SMI signal to program interrupt controller 270. Line 261 connects ASIC 250 to one input of a 2-input OR GATE 275. Interrupt controller 270 connects via line 262 to the other input of the OR GATE 275.

Microprocessor 280 includes a number of input and output pins in accordance with normal convention. The input pins include a system management interrupt (SMI) pin 282 and non-maskable interrupt (NMI) pin 284. CPU 280 also includes a general interrupt pin 288 for input of other, lower priority interrupts. Line 263 electrically connects SMI pin 282 to the output of CPU interface controller 281. Line 264 connects NMI pin 284 to another output of CPU interface controller 281. Thus, NMI pin 284 connects to interrupt controller 270 and ASIC 250 via CPU interface controller 281. Line 265 connects interrupt controller 270 to CPU interface controller 281. CD player 290 connects to the PIIX logic 272 by means of line 266.

In steady-state operation, input lines 230-232 are permitted to float freely by tri-state gates 201-203. These lines thereby exhibit a high voltage since they are connected to positive voltage source 225 through pull-up resistors 220. Conversely, output lines 240-243 are driven low by the tri-state gates 204-207.

Input lines 230-232 and output lines 240-243 normally do not make an electrical connection. However, upon the application of pressure to one of the touch-sensitive switches 210, an electrical connection is created between the respective input and output lines occurs. As used herein "switch" means any device that creates an electrical connection between corresponding input and output lines. For example, upon activation of pressure sensitive switch 212, an electrical connection is established between input line 230 and output line 240. Since line 240 is driven low in its steady state and line 230 is allowed to float free, upon electrical connection input line 230 acquires a low voltage. Since tri-state gate 201-203 is in its high-impedance state, ASIC 250 can read the voltage on the attached button line 230-232, 240-243. Therefore, this drop in voltage along line 230 is detected by ASIC 250, which then changes the respective bit in register 255 to reflect this change in line state. Each bit in the register 255 is debounced by the ASIC, and therefore the noise associated with the mechanical contact is filtered.

All of the input lines are electrically ANDed together inside the ASIC 250. The output from this AND gate is provided on line 260 and carries an external SMI signal. Line 260 is preferably a computer input-output bus, such as ISA, PCI, or MCA. Thus, under steady-state conditions when the input lines 230-232 are all at a high voltage, the output of the AND gate is high. Upon a voltage drop along one of these input lines 230-232, the output of the AND gate goes low. Consequently, at this time ASIC 250 generates an external SMI signal along line 260.

The program interrupt controller 270, included within PIIX 272 as part of the INTEL® core logic, detects this change in state along line 260. In this case, the SMI signal is asserted low on line 260. Regardless of whether the SMI signal is asserted low or high, preferably interrupt controller 270 is edge sensitive such that any transition or change in state from low to high or from high to low along line 260 indicates an SMI interrupt signal from the ASIC 250. In any case, in response the interrupt handler 270 sets an EXT₋₋ SMI flag in an internal register (not shown). This flag indicates that an external SMI has been generated. The interrupt controller 270 then asserts an SMI signal to CPU interface controller 281 along line 265 in accordance with a known protocol. CPU interface controller 281 then transmits this SMI signal to SMI pin 282.

As is well known in the art, a range of interrupts of varying priority are available on an INTEL® compatible CPU. Normally, interrupts are used to prioritize tasks that must be executed by the CPU. For example, a high priority interrupt is often used when data arrives to a computer system modem. If the CPU ignores the incoming data, there is a risk that some data will be lost. Thus, system designers provide a high-priority interrupt to the CPU so that the CPU handles the incoming data from the modem sooner rather than later. Less pressing tasks, such as an interrupt from the keyboard, use lower priority interrupts. The program interrupt controller 272 is responsible for transmitting interrupts from a variety of sources to the CPU 280.

A first type of interrupt is the system management interrupt (SMI). SMI interrupts have heretofore generally been used by portable personal computers for power management purposes and thus these interrupts are largely ignored in modern-day desktop computer design. Nonetheless, an SMI interrupt is the highest priority interrupt for an INTEL® ×86 processor. Even where there has been an operating system failure the SMI interrupt is effective, because the SMI interrupt is not dependent on the operating system (OS). Indeed, the operating system cannot operate while the CPU is handling a system management interrupt. An SMI may be asserted externally through a dedicated pin 282 located on the perimeter of the CPU chip 280.

A second type of interrupt is the non-maskable interrupt (NMI). Non-maskable interrupts generally are used only for signaling near-catastrophes, such as memory parity errors. They are the highest priority interrupt recognized by the OS of the computer. Thus, the CPU can use features of the operating system when handling an NMI interrupt that are not available when handling an SMI interrupt. On the other hand, the non-maskable interrupt is not as robust as the system management interrupt and the CPU does not respond to an NMI in as many circumstances. An NMI may be asserted externally through a second pin 284 located on the perimeter of the CPU chip 280.

Other external interrupts may be asserted through a third pin 288 located on the CPU 280. Input/output devices typically use one of these other lower-priority interrupts, which minimize the interruption to the flow of the processor. Since a range of external interrupts may be presented to this general interrupt pin, the system must have some way to determine which type of interrupt is being asserted.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram indicating the steps followed by the microprocessor 280 of the preferred embodiment upon receipt of an SMI signal along line 263. Upon detection of an SMI signal at step 310, the CPU stops whatever activities it was engaged in and saves at step 320 the contents of relevant registers in RAM 292. The saving of register information is part of the standard routine executed by the microprocessor upon receipt of an SMI signal. The CPU must then determine whether the SMI was generated externally at step 330. To do this, the CPU runs machine code called the SMI handler code, stored in the ROM BIOS (Read Only Memory Basic Input Output System). Since access to ROM is slow, upon initialization of the computer (e.g. upon power-up) this SMI handler code is copied from the ROM BIOS to the system RAM 292. Information copied to RAM in this manner from the ROM is known as "shadow ROM." To check if the SMI was generated externally, the CPU executes the SMI handler code, preferably located in the shadow ROM at a predetermined address accessible to the CPU only when handling an SMI. The CPU then checks the state of the EXT₋₋ SMI flag in interrupt handler 270 at step 330. For the purposes of this disclosure, an SMI created for a reason other than in response to the depression of a switch 210 is irrelevant. Thus, the CPU (for this example) answers the question whether the SMI is an external SMI in the affirmative. However, in the event that the SMI is not an external SMI, the CPU continues to execute a normal SMI handler routine at step 365.

Once the CPU of the preferred embodiment checks the status of the EXT₋₋ SMI flag and determines at step 330 that the SMI is an external SMI, the CPU at steps 340-360 executes another block of code stored in shadow ROM. This second block of code is written in accordance with the teachings of this disclosure. These steps allow the microprocessor 280 to deduce which switch of array of switches 210 was activated.

In accordance with this code, at step 340 the CPU addresses the ASIC 250 and directs it to begin individually releasing each of the output lines 240-243 by transitioning the lines one at a time from their steady-state logic low to the third or free-floating state. Thus, tri-state gates 204-207 are placed into their third states one by one. At step 350 the CPU discerns which output line is connected to the depressed switch by monitoring register 255. Upon the release of an output line 240-243 by the tri-state gates 204-207, the register 255 remains unchanged if the released line is not connected to the activated switch (i.e. the voltage on the released line remains low). If, however, the released line is connected to the activated switch, the voltage on the released line rises. This change in voltage will be reflected in register 255 by a change of the value in the bit that corresponds to the respective output line 240-243. This bit is not latched to the line (i.e. register 255 has a memory), so that even after the ASIC 250 releases a different tri-state gate 204-207 and the tri-state gate that was previously released returns to its pre-released state, the bit that has changed status in register 255 continues to maintain that changed status.

The voltage on the output line changes because, as explained above, when a user depresses one of the pressure sensitive switches 210, an electrical connection is formed between the relevant input line and relevant output line (e.g. when switch 212 is pressed an electrical connection is formed between lines 230 and 240). Input lines 230-232 have a high-voltage steady state due to pull-up resistors 220 and positive voltage source 225. Once the relevant tri-state gate 204-207 releases the corresponding output line 240-243, the output line's voltage rises because of the connection to voltage source 225. Thus, by monitoring register 255, the microprocessor can determine at step 350 which switch in the array of switches 210 has been pressed. Preferably, all of the output lines are sequentially released, and the ASIC 250 does not cease releasing output lines upon the discovery of a first high-voltage output line. Sufficient time exists for the microprocessor 280 to rotationally release the output lines and detect the change in voltage on one of those lines since a user keeps the switch depressed for a period many times longer than that required to execute the above-described sequence.

After determining which switch has been activated, it is necessary to perform the function that corresponds to that switch. This preferably requires exit from handling of the system management interrupt. Exit from the handling of the SMI by the microprocessor is preferred because the system is limited when handling the SMI because the SMI is not recognized by the operating system of the computer. Thus, preparatory to exiting the handling of the SMI, the CPU 280 must record which button was depressed. Therefore, at step 360 the CPU records at a particular location in RAM 292 a scan code for the switch that uniquely identifies which switch the user depressed. In the preferred embodiment, the CPU stores this scan code at EBDA (Extended BIOS Data Area) offset 48. However, this scan code may also be stored in system memory. At step 370 the CPU sets a NMI₋₋ INT flag in register 256 of the ASIC 250 indicating that ASIC 250 is required to immediately generate a non-maskable interrupt. The CPU 280 at step 380 restores any data in any microprocessor register that was altered while the microprocessor handled the SMI. The CPU 280 then exits handling the SMI at step 390 and returns control of the CPU to the operating system.

Meanwhile, in response to the NMI₋₋ INT flag set in register 256, the ASIC 250 generates an NMI interrupt along line 261. This interrupt occurs on the order of about one micro-second after the NMI₋₋ INT flag is set. This interrupt cascades through OR GATE 275 and line 264 and arrives at NMI interrupt pin 284. Thus, as soon as microprocessor 280 exits handling of the SMI, the microprocessor is presented with an NMI at pin 284. Since an NMI is the highest priority interrupt recognized by the operating system, the microprocessor 280 immediately turns its attention to handling the NMI.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the preferred sequence that the microprocessor executes upon receipt of the NMI signal. The NMI signal is received by the microprocessor 280 through pin 284 at step 410. At step 420, if the operating system is executing, the microprocessor checks the status of register 256 in ASIC 250 to determine if the NMI was generated b y the ASIC 250. At step 430, the microprocessor checks EBDA offset 48 for scan code to determine which switch the user has depressed. CPU 280 then refers to look-up table 258 at step 440 to correlate a particular switch with a particular function. The microprocessor then at step 450 notifies the appropriate OS driver to execute the desired function. For example, if the depressed button corresponds to PLAY for the CD-ROM drive, the CD ROM player receives a signal to begin playing a loaded audio CD. At step 460 the microprocessor clears register 256, and at step 470, the microprocessor exits the NMI routine and returns to its previous activity.

For instance, in array of switches 210 the user may have pressed the bezel button 120 corresponding to PLAY for the telephone answering machine. This button is clearly labeled with a geometric shape that corresponds to PLAY and is familiar to most users from their experience with CD players and VCRs. An audio message recorded by the computer system thus begins playing with depression of only a single button. Moreover, there is no need for the user to wait while the computer is busy with other tasks. Instead, the computer responds relatively quickly to the user instruction, giving the computer the feel of a TAM and giving the user a sense of control. After the computer has begun playing the message, the CPU 280 exits handling the NMI and resumes whatever activity it was executing before depression by the user of the PLAY switch. In similar fashion, a STOP button or other TAM control button may be included as part of the bezel of buttons on the computer chassis.

Another function corresponding to one of array of button 210 could be sending a facsimile. In this case, instead of addressing a peripheral device on bus 285 such as the CD ROM drive 130, the microprocessor executes a facsimile application. Thus, shortly after the user presses the proper button on the computer chassis 100, the user is presented with a facsimile application on the computer screen. The user may then manipulate the application however he desires before the microprocessor returns to its previous activities. Therefore, this button too gives the computer the feel of a dedicated consumer electronics device and gives the user a sense of control. Similarly, the buttons on computer mini-tower 100 could correspond to the functions of a CD player or television.

The preferred embodiment of the present invention has numerous advantages over the prior art. First, the array of touch sensitive switches 210 allows the user an input data path that is an alternative to using the mouse or keyboard. Second, the array of switches 210 is superior to a keyboard, since each switch correlates to a command, and not just a character. While a vast number of commands may be entered via a keyboard, often times many keystrokes are required to transmit a single command to the computer. By equating one key with only one command, the user is given a greater sense of control over the functions of the computer and the computer is more "user-friendly." Third, the array of switches 210 is superior to a mouse because it eliminates the need to navigate through many levels of icons or pull-up windows as is often required by a typical computer interface. Fourth, each switch is labeled in a familiar way for the user, and thus the computer can simulate other popular consumer electronics. Fifth, the functions associated with the bezel buttons remain constant from application to application, thus minimizing confusion by the computer operator. Sixth, the array of switches 210 uses the highest priority interrupt, a priority higher than any used by a key on a keyboard. This results in a very nimble computer that can respond quickly to a command that has been input, even when the microprocessor is slow or is hung. This immediate response by the computer to the switches 210 enhances the user's sense of control. Seventh, the present invention's unique method and architecture for determining which switch has been depressed permits implementation with very few input and output lines while permitting a relatively large number of switches. Specifically, 2x lines provide a response for up to x² number of switches (i.e. 4 lines allows for an array of up to 4 buttons, whereas 8 lines allows for an array of up to 16 buttons). This allows a manufacturer to add many more functions or switches to an array 210 without a great increase in cost. Eighth, the invention uses components and interrupts that are already present on the microprocessor such that the affordability of the computer is maintained. Ninth, the array of buttons is placed at a convenient, easily accessible location for the user, such as on the surface of the computer mini-tower.

While preferred embodiments of this invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or teaching of this invention. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only and are not limiting. Many variations and modifications of the system and apparatus are possible and are within the scope of the invention. For example, the teachings disclosed herein may be applied to any microprocessor-based system including palm tops or personal digital assistants, and the term "computer system" thus encompasses any microprocessor-based system. Similarly, bezel buttons 110 could be located at places other than on the chassis. Functions from other devices may be simulated and more or fewer switches could be used. In addition to the PLAY button described above, the computer could respond to a particular switch activation by preparing a particular program, such as a facsimile program to send facsimiles to others. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited to the embodiments described herein, but is only limited by the claims that follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer system including a chassis for housing the computer system electronics, including the system processor, comprising:a button mounted externally on the chassis; a switch associated with said button, said switch changing state when said button is depressed; a logic device electronically connected to said switch for detecting when said switch changes state, and in response generating a interrupt signal to the system processor; said system processor transmitting a signal to a peripheral device in response to said interrupt signal.
 2. The computer system of claim 1, wherein said computer system includes a mini-tower, said button being located on said mini-tower.
 3. The computer system of claim 1, wherein said computer system includes a monitor, said button being located on said monitor.
 4. The computer system of claim 1, further comprising:a signal generator, wherein at least one button is hardwired to said system processor such that said signal generator sends a first interrupt to said system processor upon activation of said button.
 5. The computer system of claim 4, wherein said system processor determines the identity of said activated button while handling said first interrupt.
 6. The computer system of claim 5, wherein said signal generator sends a second interrupt signal to said system processor such that said system processor handles said second interrupt signal immediately upon exiting the handling of said first interrupt.
 7. The computer system of claim 6, further comprising:a memory having at least one address; and a look-up table correlating said button to a particular one address of said memory; wherein said address of said memory holds code, said code being executed by said system processor while said system processor is handling said second interrupt.
 8. The computer system of claim 7, wherein upon completion of handling said second interrupt, said system processor resumes an activity said system processor was executing previous to said activation of said button.
 9. The computer system of claim 7, wherein said first interrupt is a system management interrupt.
 10. The computer system of claim 7, wherein said first interrupt is a system management interrupt and said second interrupt is a non-maskable interrupt.
 11. A method of correlating a switch with a function, comprising:a. placing at least one switch on the exterior of a computer; b. connecting said switch to a microprocessor in said computer; c. sending a first interrupt signal to said microprocessor upon activation of said switch; and d. determining the identity of said switch.
 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising:e. sending a second interrupt signal to said microprocessor; f. correlating said identity of said switch to a particular function; g. executing said function.
 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising:h. resuming an activity that was being executed prior to said activation of said switch.
 14. The method of claim 12, wherein said first interrupt is a system management interrupt.
 15. The method of claim 12, wherein said first interrupt is a system management interrupt and said second interrupt is a non-maskable interrupt.
 16. The method of claim 12, wherein said step of determining includes saving a scan code uniquely identifying said switch.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein said step of correlating includes accessing a look-up table.
 18. The method of claim 12, wherein said function is a telephone answering function.
 19. The method of claim 12, wherein said function is a facsimile application.
 20. A computer interface for a system including a system processor and a chassis, comprising:an array of buttons mounted externally on the chassis; an array of switches associated with said array of buttons, each of said buttons being associated with a respective switch, said each switch changing state when said respective button is depressed; a switch state detector electronically connected to each of said switches, said switch state detector detecting when said switch changes state, and in response generating a system management interrupt signal to the system processor; said system processor executing a function in response to said system management interrupt signal.
 21. The computer interface of claim 20, wherein said function is a telephone answering function. 